18
19°
220
Enclosure F. 7
autopsies in 1853 from 5th April, Proteurs1 date of first order to Dr Wharry, to end of year: only 17
17 in 18842:
14 in 1885: and 19 in 1886 to the end of October. From the 5th November last, the date when Dr Wharry was called upon to undertake these duties during the illness of Dr. ... Marques to the 3rd December when the case was finally dealt with in Executive Council, there had been seven cases.
... of external examination of bodies and only one autopsy.
A view of the body coupled with the facts contained in the Police Report on the case is, in the great majority of cases, sufficient to show to the Medical Officer that the death was either clearly due to natural causes or was the result of an accident.
13. Finding that Dr. Wharry persisted in disobeying the order issued to him he was on 8th November charged with insubordination and disobedience
1It seems "Proteurs" is an OCR error, possibly should be "Protector's". However, without clear context, it's left as is.18
19°
220
Enclosure F. 7
autopsies in 1853 from 5th April, Proteurs 7 date of first order to Dr Wharry, to end of year: only 17
17 in 18844:
14 in 1885: and 19 in 1886 to the end of October. From the 5th November last, the date when Dr
to
Wharry
was called
upon
undertake these duties during
the illness of Dr Marques to
the 3rd December when the ease
11773
finally dealt with in
Excentive Council, there had
been seven pases.
احمد
of external
examination of bodies and
only
only
one
autopsy.
A view of
the
-body coupled with the facts contained in the Police Report on :
the sase is, in the great majority of cases, sufficient to show to the Medical Officer that the
death was either e
clearly
due to
natural causes or was the result
of an accident.
13.
Finding that Dr.
Wharry persisted in disobeying
the order issued to him he was
8th November charged with -
insubordination and disobities
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.